LawShortcut
Home › Free notes › Contract Law › The postal rule
Contract Law · Free notes

The Postal Rule in Irish Contract Law

When acceptance is complete on posting, the situations where the rule does not apply, instantaneous and electronic communications, and the timing trap it creates with revocation. For FE-1 and King's Inns students.

By Aoibheann Nic Eochaidh · Irish law · reading time ~6 min · updated 29 October 2026
In short: the general rule is that acceptance takes effect on receipt. The postal rule is a narrow exception: where acceptance by post is contemplated, acceptance is complete the moment the letter is posted — even if it is delayed or never arrives. It applies to acceptance only; a posted revocation still takes effect on receipt.

The postal rule is a favourite exam point because it fixes the exact moment (and place) a contract forms, and because it behaves differently from the ordinary receipt rule. It sits within the wider law of offer and acceptance.

The general rule: acceptance on receipt

Ordinarily, acceptance is effective only when it is communicated to and received by the offeror (Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 QB 327 England & Wales, applied by the Supreme Court in Kelly v Cruise Catering Ltd [1994] IESC 3 Ireland; Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl [1983] 2 AC 34 England & Wales). The postal rule is the exception to this, not the starting point.

The postal exception

Where the post is a contemplated method of acceptance, acceptance is complete on posting. The rule originates in Adams v Lindsell (1818) 1 B & Ald 681 Court of King's Bench (E&W) — without it, no postal contract could ever be concluded (an infinite regress of confirmations). It applies even where the letter is lost and never delivered (Household Fire Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 Ex D 216 England & Wales).

Irish law adopts the rule. In Sanderson v Cunningham [1919] 2 IR 234 Court of Appeal (IE) an insurance contract was formed where the acceptance was posted, not where it was received. The Supreme Court applied the rule in Kelly v Cruise Catering Ltd [1994] IESC 3 Ireland: the plaintiff signed his contract of employment in Dublin and posted it to Oslo, so acceptance was complete on posting and the contract was made in Dublin. Blayney J accepted that an acceptance may be lost in the post but held that this was "not a relevant consideration in the present case where the signed contract was received", and that there were "no circumstances here calling for any divergence from the well-established rule". In Phoenix Rock Enterprises v Hughes [2025] IEHC 126 Ireland, the High Court stressed that the rule is a limited exception that applies only where the parties intended agreement to be concluded that way.

When the postal rule does not apply

Instantaneous and electronic communications

The postal rule does not generally apply to electronic communications. Electronic acceptance operates on a receipt basis, in line with the treatment of instantaneous communications such as telephone and telex (Entores [1955] 2 QB 327; Brinkibon [1983] 2 AC 34 England & Wales). In Ireland, s.21 of the Electronic Commerce Act 2000 — headed "Time and place of dispatch and receipt of electronic communications" — sets out the statutory default rules for when and where an electronic communication is taken to be sent and received. Whether a given message is an offer or an acceptance still turns on how the process is structured.

Need the whole formation topic in one place? Contract Law Module 1 works offer, termination and acceptance with a case table and model-answer skeleton. See the complete Contract Law course →
The classic trap — revocation is different. The postal rule applies to acceptance only. A posted revocation takes effect on receipt (Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) 5 CPD 344). Problem-question timelines are often built to exploit this asymmetry: an acceptance posted before a revocation arrives forms a contract, even though the revocation was posted first.
Contract Law · Module 1

The full, exam-ready version

Formation I: offer, termination, acceptance (including the postal rule), certainty and formalities — with the full case table, worked cross-border examples and a model-answer skeleton.

see the full Contract course →

Still unclear?

Does the postal rule apply if the acceptance letter is lost?

Yes — where the post was a contemplated method, acceptance is complete on posting even if the letter is delayed or never arrives (Household Fire & Carriage Accident Insurance Co Ltd v Grant). Kelly v Cruise Catering is not authority for the never-arrives case: there the posted contract was in fact received, and Blayney J said so expressly.

When does the postal rule not apply?

Where the offer requires actual receipt (Holwell Securities v Hughes), where the letter is mis-addressed through the acceptor's fault, or where it was unreasonable to use the post.

Does the postal rule apply to email?

No — the postal rule does not generally apply to electronic communications. Electronic acceptance operates on a receipt basis (in line with instantaneous communications: Entores; Brinkibon), and in Ireland s.21 of the Electronic Commerce Act 2000 governs the time and place of receipt.

One page on how to structure an answer

A single page on structuring an answer under time pressure, straight to your inbox. You will also hear when a new topic is added. Nothing else.